Soft Law and competition policy: promoting competition through guidelines in Brazil

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7215826

Keywords:

Competition. Enforcement. Guidelines. Soft Law.

Abstract

This paper examines the use of soft law in competition policy. The focus is on the guidelines issued by the Brazilian competition authority in order to foster a better understanding of the competition law and enforcement approaches. The economic agents and their legal advisors benefit from these measures, as they increase the predictability and transparency of competition enforcement, facilitate self-assessment, and improve legal certainty for business transactions that often involve high monetary sums. From previous experience, these guidelines are often well perceived by local competition community as there is an increasingly concern with the objective of gathering information from interested parties to facilitate the drafting of higher quality documents through public consultations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Otávio Augusto de Oliveira Cruz Filho, Centro Universitário UniProcessus, DF, Brasil

[1] Otávio Augusto de Oliveira Cruz Filho is the Chief of Service of International Cooperation at the International Unit of the Brazilian Administrative Council for Economic Defense. He holds a Master’s degree in Public Administration from the University of Brasilia and is a postgraduate student in Economic Law and Competition at Fundação Getúlio Vargas.

References

ADMINISTRATIVE COUNCIL FOR ECONOMIC DEFENSE (CADE). 2016 Guide for Horizontal Merger Review (H-Guide). Available at https://cdn.cade.gov.br/Portal/centrais-de-conteudo/publicacoes/guias-do-cade/Guide-for-Horizontal-Merger-Review.pdf.

ADMINISTRATIVE COUNCIL FOR ECONOMIC DEFENSE (CADE). 2021 Management Report. Available at https://cdn.cade.gov.br/Portal/acesso-a-informacao/Transpar%C3%AAncia%20e%20Presta%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20de%20Contas/Relat%C3%B3rio%20Integrado%20de%20Gest%C3%A3o%202021.pdf.

EUROPEAN COMISSION. Approval of the content of a draft for a COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION: Guidelines on vertical restraints. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/competition-policy/system/files/2022-05/20220510_guidelines_vertical_restraints_art101_TFEU_.pdf.

KNYAZEVA, Irina. Competition Advocacy: Soft Power in Competitive Policy. In: Procedia Economics and Finance 6. 2013.

OECD. Arbitration and Competition (2010). Available at https://www.oecd.org/competition/abuse/49294392.pdf.

ORGANIZATION FOR ECONOMIC COOPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT (OECD). Peer Reviews of Competition Law and Policy: Brazil (2019). Available at https://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/oecd-peer-reviews-of-competition-law-and-policy-brazil-ENG-web.pdf

QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON. 2018 International Arbitration Survey: The Evolution Of Inter-national Arbitration. Londres: School of International Arbitration, 2018. Available at https://arbitration.qmul.ac.uk/media/arbitration/docs/2018-International-Arbitration-Survey---The-Evolution-of-International-Arbitration-(2).PDF.

SHELTON, Dinah. International law and “relative normativity”. International law, v. 2, p. 159-184, 2006.

SILVEIRA, Paulo Burnier da; FERNANDES, Victor Oliveira. The “Car Wash Operation” in Brazil: Challenges and Perspectives in the Fight Against Bid Rigging. In: SILVEIRA, Paulo Burnier e KOVACIC, William Evan. Global Competition Enforcement. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International B.V., 2019, p. 125–145.

US Department of Justice, Justice Department Issues Statement on the Vertical Merger Guidelines (September 15, 2021). Available at https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-issues-statement-vertical-merger-guidelines.

ZLATINA, Georgieva. Soft Law in EU Competition Law and its Judicial Reception in Member States - A Theoretical Perspective. TILEC Discussion Paper, n. 35, 2014.

Downloads

Published

2022-10-17