Contractual Freedom and Its Limits in Incoterms Rules: An Analytical Study

Authors

Keywords:

Freedom of contract, Party autonomy, International sales contracts, Maritime sales, Risk allocation, Transaction costs.

Abstract

This paper undertakes a doctrinal examination of one of the fundamental issues arising in connection with international trade terms, with particular focus on the rules promulgated by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), commonly known as Incoterms. These rules are optional in nature and do not inherently possess the characteristic of being binding; their legal force derives exclusively from the expressed intention of the contracting parties where such intention is directed toward their incorporation, whether in their original form or as modified through the augmentation or reduction of the obligations they establish. Notwithstanding this optional character, the recognition of party autonomy in this context necessarily invites scrutiny as to whether the principle of contractual freedom operates without qualification in this domain, or whether it is subject to limiting constraints—most notably within the framework of international sales contracts—at the intersection of municipal law frameworks, international conventions, and the normative architecture of Incoterms. Against this background, the present study seeks to determine the scope of party autonomy in the incorporation of Incoterms and to identify the boundaries by which it is circumscribed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Lakhel Makhlouf, PhD, University of 20 August 1955 Skikda, Algeria

PhD, Lecturer (class A) in Faculty of Law and Political Science University of 20 August 1955 Skikda, Algeria (2010); a Master’s degree in Law from Mohamed Seddik Ben Yahia University of Jijel, Algeria. (2009); a PhD in Law from Faculty of Law and Political Science Batna 1 University- Hadj lakhdar, Batna, Algeria (2018).

References

Ağaoğlu, C. (2020). Incoterms 2020. Public and Private International Law Bulletin, 40(2), 1113–1132. Istanbul University Press. https://doi.org/10.26650/ppil.2020.40.2.0005

Coetzee, J. (2012). Incoterms 2010: Codified mercantile custom or standard contract terms? Stellenbosch Law Review, 23(3), 564–585.

Coetzee, J. (2013a). Incoterms variants: Greater precision or more uncertainty? De Jure Law Journal, 46(2), 581–600.

Coetzee, J. (2013b). The interplay between Incoterms and the CISG. Journal of Law and Commerce, 32(1), 1–35.

Debattista, C. (2020). Introduction to Incoterms 2020. International Chamber of Commerce.

Fedi, L. (2018). Le droit anglais des ventes maritimes: À propos de F. Lorenzon & Y. Baatz, Sassoon on C.I.F and F.O.B Contracts (Sweet & Maxwell, 6th ed.). Droit Maritime Français, (802), 415–420.

Imamova, D. I. (2024). Consequences of incorrect application and interpretation of the international trade rules of Incoterms. In Academic Research in Modern Science: International Scientific Online Conference. University of World Economy and Diplomacy. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14214304

International Chamber of Commerce. (2019). Incoterms® 2020: ICC rules for the use of domestic and international trade terms. ICC Publishing.

International Chamber of Commerce. (2025). National regulatory barriers to the Incoterms® 2020 rules. ICC.

International Trade Council. (n.d.). The Incoterms playbook: Strategies and solutions for every export scenario. International Trade Council.

Petrova, M., Krugerova, M., & Koziel, M. (2021). New challenges in Incoterms in the background of their historical development. ACC Journal, 27(2), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/004/2021-2-008

Pusapati, U. M. (2024). The application of Incoterms 2020 in international contracts—Critical appraisal. International Journal of Academic Research, 11(1), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13134615

Spanogle, J. A. (1997). Incoterms and UCC Article 2—Conflicts and confusions. The International Lawyer, 31(1), 111–132.

Yawar, M. E., & Amani, A. (2025). Incoterms in international trade law. Euro-Global Journal of Linguistics and Language Education, 2(1), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.69760/egjlle.2500014

Downloads

Published

2026-05-26