Define artificial intelligence outcomes as intellectual property collective right
Palavras-chave:
Artificial Intelligence, Intellectual Property, Innovations, Collective rightsResumo
AI programs are widely used and AI-generated programs to impulse innovations are not entitled to AI property rights. There is a difficulty in including the AI as the autonomous author of an innovation process. The research seeks WIPO's advice and AI general trend experts' discussions and tries to dig into definitions and meanings. The results clarify differences between AI uses for intellectual property copyrights and business patents or AI cultural, social, and commercial impacts. The research shows the mainstream explication because AI is not entitled to the owner of an IP. The paper examines all these cases and performs a summary framework orientation, concluding that the IP system must change and allow AI to make intellectual rights a collective right.
Downloads
Referências
Aveni, A. (2023). Reid Hoffman’s impromptu. Amplifying our humanity through AI. Review. Revista Processus De Políticas Públicas E Desenvolvimento Social, 5(10), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10160496
Buchanan, J. M. (1965). An economic theory of clubs. Economica, 32(125), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.2307/2552442
European Union (EU), EPRS, & STOA Centre for Artificial Intelligence (C4AI). (2023, October). AI repository. European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/en/article/20230601STO93804/eu-ai-act-first-regulation-on-artificial-intelligence
European Union. (2021). EUR-Lex - 52021PC0206 - EN - EUR-Lex. EUR-Lex. Archived from the original on 23 August 2021. Retrieved March 7, 2024, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu
Feigenbaum, E., & Feldman, J. (1963). Computers and thought. McGraw-Hill.
Haugeland, J. (1985). Artificial intelligence: The very idea. MIT Press.
Kurzweil, R. (1990). The age of intelligent machines. MIT Press.
Lolli, G. (1994). Alan M. Turing: Collect works of A. M. Turing: Mechanical intelligence [Intelligenza meccanica], (A cura di Torino, Bollati Boringhieri, 1994; ristampa 2007). Bollati Boringhieri. ISBN 978-88-339-0880-9.
Mankiw, N. G. (2012). Principles of microeconomics (6th ed.). South-Western Cengage Learning.
McCarthy, J. (1959). Programs with common sense. In Proceedings of the Teddington Conference on the Mechanization of Thought Processes (pp. 756–791). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office. Archived October 4, 2013, at the Wayback Machine.
Minsky, M. (1970). Form and content in computer science. Journal of the ACM, 17(2), 197–215. https://doi.org/10.1145/321574.321575
OECD/Eurostat. (2005). Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data (3rd ed.). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264013100-en
Olson, M. (1971). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press.
Ostrom, E. (2003). How types of goods and property rights jointly affect collective action. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 15(3), 239–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692803015003002
Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., & Walker, J. (1994). Rules, games, and common-pool resources. University of Michigan Press.
Ostrom, V., & Ostrom, E. (1977). A theory for institutional analysis of common pool problems. In G. Hardin & J. Baden (Eds.), Managing the commons (pp. 157–172). W.H. Freeman.
Picht, P. G., Brunner, V., & Schmid, R. (2022). Artificial intelligence and intellectual property law: From diagnosis to action. Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition Research Paper, (22-08). https://ssrn.com/abstract=4122985
Picht, P. G., & Thouvenin, F. (2023). AI and IP: Theory to policy and back again – Policy and research recommendations at the intersection of artificial intelligence and intellectual property. IIC, 54, 916–940. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-023-01344-5
Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (1998). Intelligenza artificiale un approccio moderno (Chaps. 1-26). UTET.
Simon, H. (1981). The science of the artificial (2nd ed.). MIT Press.
Varian, H. R. (1992). Microeconomic analysis (3rd ed.). Norton.
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). (2022). World intellectual property indicators 2022. WIPO. https://doi.org/10.34667/tind.47082
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). (2007, June 5-6). The role of collective marks, certification marks and geographical indications. WIPO Asia Sub-Regional Workshop on the use of intellectual property (IP) by SME support institutions for the promotion of competitiveness of SMEs in the food processing sector. https://www.wipo.int/meetings/en/details.jsp?meeting_id=12762
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). (n.d.). WIPO conversation on intellectual property (IP) and frontier technologies. https://www.wipo.int/meetings/en/details.jsp?meeting_id=51767
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
URN
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
A submissão de originais para a Revista Processus de Estudo de Gestão, jurídicos e Financeiros implica na transferência, pelos autores, dos direitos de publicação. Os direitos autorais para os artigos publicados nesta revista são do autor, com direitos da revista sobre a primeira publicação. Os autores somente poderão utilizar os mesmos resultados em outras publicações indicando claramente a Revista Processus de Estudo de Gestão, jurídicos e Financeiros como o meio da publicação original.
Licença Creative Commons
Exceto onde especificado diferentemente, aplicam-se í matéria publicada neste periódico os termos de uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional, que permite o uso irrestrito, a distribuição e a reprodução em qualquer meio desde que a publicação original seja corretamente citada.
